The Employment and Labour Relations Court has clarified how employers must handle statutory deductions on unfair termination awards. The decision resolved debate over whether compensation after employment should attract levies tied to active work.
The case involved Fourth Generation Capital Ltd and its former employee, Alexander John Frank Stubbs. The court awarded Mr Stubbs compensation and pay in lieu of notice after ruling his termination unfair. The company deducted PAYE, NSSF, the Housing Levy, and Social Health Insurance contributions before paying. This raised questions about what qualifies as income after leaving employment.
Mr Stubbs contested the deductions. He maintained that post employment compensation is not salary. Applying levies meant for active employees undermines the purpose of compensation. He also warned that taxing court awards forces employees to pay twice for employment benefits.
The company defended its approach. It cited laws governing taxation of employment-related payments. Past interpretations of the Income Tax Act require employers to deduct tax when payments arise from employment.
Ruling Protects Workers’ Rights
The court reviewed the law and the purpose of compensation. It determined that unfair termination awards are remedial. They restore the worker for harm suffered and do not count as ongoing income. The judge noted that other laws already provide contribution methods for employed, self employed, or voluntary contributors. Deducting extra levies from compensation would be unfair.
Income tax and employment levies were treated differently. Housing Levy and Social Health Insurance contributions depend on active employment. They cannot apply to post-employment awards. Imposing these deductions would amount to double payment. It would also violate fair labour practices.
The ruling provides guidance to employers, employees, and legal practitioners. Compensation after unfair termination serves a corrective purpose. It should not attract deductions intended for salary. The decision also clarifies how organisations should handle statutory obligations during employment disputes.
The court reinforced workers’ protection. It established a clear framework for managing post-employment awards. The ruling ensures fairness and prevents financial penalties on former employees.
Also read: World Bank to Cut 22,000 Consultant Roles
